Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jenny Shank's avatar

You are a true ham-and-egger--the kind of writer I wrote about in an essay for Poets & Writers several years back:

https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA247445580&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=08916136&p=LitRC&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E850c8614

I think moving to Pasadena was a good choice--you had to try it! And it doesn't seem like there's any answer to achieving readership/book/film sales. Writing is definitely a vocation that requires you not to look for external validation. I think you're doing great, and you've helped a lot of people along the way.

Expand full comment
Glenn Gers's avatar

After 50 years devoted to creative writing and film and suchlike stuff, I truly believe that measuring "success" by external markers like which publisher you had to how many tickets you sold or how much money you made is suicidally missing the point of art and life. I keep thinking about the bestselling novelist of 1913 and the big hit opera of 1851...who the hell knows or cares? Or the big-budget movies every year that don't work. Or the TV series no on watches. People work so hard on them (or hate doing them, for that check...) And even Shakespeare and Joyce and Hemingway: how relevant are they now, really? Not to say they're not great, just: who the hell made this a test?! Who made it a competition?! Do things you think are good. Show 'em to however many people will look at them. Repeat. That's all any artist can do, and I think it's so great you've done it and keep doing it.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts